NannyStateLiberationFront.net Reports U.S. Medical JournalSays: Obesity ‘Crisis’ Is Fattening Big Government
According to a recent blog post from www.nannystateliberationfront.net, a new report appearing in an American medical journal says the federal government is exploiting the nation’s obesity ‘crisis’ to “extract more money from taxpayers and to expand government.â€
US Medical Journal Reports Obesity ‘Crisis’ Is Fattening Big Government
“The article’s authors note that nanny state bureaucrats have already failed in their attempts to meet self-imposed goals for reducing obesity, perhaps, because they are targeting food sources that pose no proven risk to Americans’ waistlines.
Michael L. Marlow, Ph.D. and Alden F. Shiers, Ph.D., both economists at California Polytechnic State University, write in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons that the federal government has erred in its decision to use ‘sin taxes’ as its weapon of choice to win the war on obesity. The primary target of these sin taxes is sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), despite empirical studies that do not show a clear, if at all existent, link between SSBs and obesity, the authors state:
‘It is sheer folly to single out a specific food or beverage as the ‘cause of obesity’ when common sense indicates that obesity is a product of genetics, hormones, food choice, exercise or lack thereof, and the basic equation: Calories consumed minus calories expended = weight gain or weight loss. If one eliminates soda pop from his diet, while consuming 10,000 calories per day and expending 1,000 calories per day in exercise, that individual will gain weight. Moreover, if government interventions somehow reduce soda consumption, it is likely that substitution will take place, such as eating more food or simply adding more sugar to home-brewed iced tea. Effects on weight are thus ambiguous at best.’â€
Related posts:
- President Obama Declares September “Childhood Obesity Awareness Monthâ€
- Parents Say: Ban The Toys If You Want … My Kids Will Still Ask for Happy Meals
- Will Kids Want to Choose a Healthier Option for a Toy?
- Instead of Calories, Scientists Claim Chemicals are the Reasons behind Obesity
- San Francisco On The Fast Track To Banning Happy Meal Toys
Tags: adolescent obesity, barack obama, blogs, cause childhood obesity, cause of childhood obesity, causes of child obesity, causes of childhood obesity, childhood obesity, childhood obesity america, childhood obesity article, childhood obesity articles, childhood obesity causes, childhood obesity cdc, childhood obesity effects, childhood obesity exercise, childhood obesity factors, childhood obesity facts, childhood obesity fast food, childhood obesity nutrition, childhood obesity percent, childhood obesity prevalence, childhood obesity programs, childhood obesity research, childhood obesity risk, childhood obesity trends, children obesity, early childhood obesity, effects of childhood obesity, family meals, fast food, fast food obesity, food laws, government, government control, government issues, health laws, healthy children, healthy meals, law, laws, legislation, medical journal, Michelle Obama, Nanny State Liberation Front, nutrition, obama, obama health care, obese children, obese parents, obesity, obesity adult, obesity adults, obesity blogs, obesity causes, obesity child, obesity childhood, obesity children, obesity crisis, obesity diet, obesity solutions, obesity solver, obesity statistics, overweight children, president obama, prevent childhood obesity, preventing childhood obesity, preventing obesity